Farm Subsidy information
Seminole County, Georgia
Total Subsidies in Seminole County, Georgia, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,182
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Seminole County, Georgia totaled $220,996,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Scott Farms G P | Brinson, GA 39825 | $6,751,526 |
2 | 3rt Farms | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $6,076,786 |
3 | Killarney Farm Partnership | Jakin, GA 39861 | $5,230,147 |
4 | Hanna Farming Partnership | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $4,863,952 |
5 | Mims Farms | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $4,578,376 |
6 | Double H Farms | Iron City, GA 39859 | $3,711,114 |
7 | Dollar Family Farms | Bainbridge, GA 39818 | $3,565,297 |
8 | Eddie Miller Farms Inc | Iron City, GA 39859 | $3,539,633 |
9 | First Port City Bank ** | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $2,928,187 |
10 | D & P Farms | Iron City, GA 39859 | $2,523,151 |
11 | Southwest Georgia Farm Credit ** | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $2,450,602 |
12 | First State Bank Of Blakely ** | Colquitt, GA 39837 | $2,181,697 |
13 | Eddie Miller Farming Part LLC | Iron City, GA 39859 | $2,123,204 |
14 | Thompson Family Farms | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $2,112,092 |
15 | Branda Trawick Jr And Atherlone Trawick Dba Four O | Iron City, GA 39859 | $1,794,108 |
16 | 3r Thompson Farms Inc | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $1,759,308 |
17 | John B Clarke Jr | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $1,698,922 |
18 | Donnie Ray Miller | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $1,632,724 |
19 | L & L Farms Inc | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $1,509,077 |
20 | Beryl S Broome Estate | Donalsonville, GA 39845 | $1,504,682 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>