Total Commodity Programs in Sumter County, Georgia, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 260
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Sumter County, Georgia totaled $6,042,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Southeastern Sod Incorporated | Americus, GA 31709 | $490,285 |
2 | Citizens Bank Of Americus ** | Richland, GA 31825 | $412,444 |
3 | Sumter Sod LLC | Leslie, GA 31764 | $354,439 |
4 | Ja Minor Family Farm Gp | Leslie, GA 31764 | $274,749 |
5 | Southwest Georgia Farm Credit ** | Bainbridge, GA 39817 | $236,117 |
6 | Bank Of Dawson ** | Dawson, GA 39842 | $219,243 |
7 | Pine Hill Planting Co Gp | Cordele, GA 31015 | $172,645 |
8 | Triple H Farms Inc | Plains, GA 31780 | $156,786 |
9 | Southeastern Leased Farms Inc | Americus, GA 31709 | $143,445 |
10 | Lyle Farms LLC | Cobb, GA 31735 | $140,824 |
11 | Mark Wendell Israel | Smithville, GA 31787 | $134,458 |
12 | Cjb Farms | Plains, GA 31780 | $131,622 |
13 | Leatherbrook Holsteins LLC | Americus, GA 31709 | $120,508 |
14 | Shannon Akin III | Vienna, GA 31092 | $115,727 |
15 | Harold J Israel Jr | Smithville, GA 31787 | $115,315 |
16 | First State Bank Of Blakely ** | Colquitt, GA 39837 | $110,699 |
17 | Aggeorgia Farm Credit Aca ** | Ocilla, GA 31774 | $109,417 |
18 | O'hearn Farms Partnership | Shellman, GA 39886 | $97,241 |
19 | Bobby Strange Farms LLC | Americus, GA 31709 | $89,187 |
20 | Wolf Creek Sod Inc | Americus, GA 31719 | $84,243 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>