Farm Subsidy information
Hawaii
Total Subsidies in Hawaii, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 1,088
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hawaii totaled $15,975,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Puna Chocolate Company | Hilo, HI 96720 | $42,499 |
62 | Palika Ranch Family Limited Partnership | Kealakekua, HI 96750 | $41,479 |
63 | Triple D Ranch Inc | Paauilo, HI 96776 | $41,024 |
64 | Five-o Cattle Co LLC | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $40,476 |
65 | Griffith Livestock Cattle Company | Waianae, HI 96792 | $40,241 |
66 | Jerry Egami | Kealakekua, HI 96750 | $39,723 |
67 | Law Tieng's Farm LLC | Waipahu, HI 96797 | $39,067 |
68 | Ronsten Padover Andrade Jr | Keaau, HI 96749 | $38,925 |
69 | Medeiros Farm Inc | Kalaheo, HI 96741 | $38,770 |
70 | Parker Ranch Inc | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $38,704 |
71 | Lopes Farm LLC | Haiku, HI 96708 | $38,025 |
72 | Roy Loando & Allison Loando Dba Triple Lll Ranch | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $37,561 |
73 | Hawaii Lowline Cattle Co LLC | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $37,473 |
74 | Stanton I Loo | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $37,408 |
75 | Guy Kaniho | Kailua Kona, HI 96740 | $36,926 |
76 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $36,603 |
77 | Roger Y Uchima | Honomu, HI 96728 | $36,442 |
78 | Richard A Johansen | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $36,008 |
79 | Xing Xing Farm LLC | Waianae, HI 96792 | $35,592 |
80 | Crystal K.d. Kam | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $35,209 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”