Emergency Conservation Program in Hawaii, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 593
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Hawaii totaled $17,942,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kuahiwi Contractors Inc | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $459,984 |
2 | Kukaiau Ranch LLC | Hilo, HI 96720 | $400,000 |
3 | Merle Becker | Pahala, HI 96777 | $344,580 |
4 | Palani Ranch Company Inc | Holualoa, HI 96725 | $324,038 |
5 | Keane Iranon | Volcano, HI 96785 | $283,363 |
6 | Double N Ranch LLC | Volcano, HI 96785 | $279,512 |
7 | Kohala Nursery Inc | Kapaau, HI 96755 | $272,688 |
8 | Freddy Nobriga Enterprises Inc | Hilo, HI 96720 | $252,958 |
9 | S C Ranch Co Inc | Paauilo, HI 96776 | $242,891 |
10 | Kauai Coffee Company Inc | Kalaheo, HI 96741 | $241,715 |
11 | Jerry Egami | Kealakekua, HI 96750 | $240,147 |
12 | George Hirowatari Farms LLC | Ninole, HI 96773 | $239,076 |
13 | Stanton I Loo | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $227,181 |
14 | Calvin Riley Louis | Pahala, HI 96777 | $221,388 |
15 | Walter D Andrade | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $218,196 |
16 | Kk Ranch Inc | Paauilo, HI 96776 | $208,822 |
17 | Hawaiian Sunshine Farms Inc | Papaikou, HI 96781 | $200,000 |
18 | Thomas Dean Kaniho | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $199,998 |
19 | Gomes Ranch LLC | Kailua Kona, HI 96745 | $195,564 |
20 | J Hanoa Cattle Co LLC | Pahala, HI 96777 | $182,274 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>