Farm Subsidy information
Hawaii County, Hawaii
Total Subsidies in Hawaii County, Hawaii, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,645
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hawaii County, Hawaii totaled $168,847,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kuahiwi Contractors Inc | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $3,842,616 |
2 | Ponoholo Ranch Ltd | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $3,812,971 |
3 | Hlh LLC | Honolulu, HI 96823 | $3,470,591 |
4 | Kahua Ranch Limited | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $3,422,388 |
5 | Jerry Egami | Kealakekua, HI 96750 | $3,112,186 |
6 | Walter D Andrade | Naalehu, HI 96772 | $3,018,715 |
7 | Kapapala Ranch | Pahala, HI 96777 | $2,739,085 |
8 | Boteilho Hawaii Enterprises Inc | Hawi, HI 96719 | $2,700,670 |
9 | Ernest Deluz | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $2,163,465 |
10 | Kk Ranch Inc | Paauilo, HI 96776 | $2,114,476 |
11 | S C Ranch Co Inc | Paauilo, HI 96776 | $1,903,001 |
12 | Agee Inc | Ninole, HI 96773 | $1,782,549 |
13 | Raymond A Lorenzo | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $1,713,350 |
14 | Hind Daleico LLC | Kailua Kona, HI 96745 | $1,628,000 |
15 | Freddy Nobriga Enterprises Inc | Hilo, HI 96720 | $1,550,482 |
16 | Palani Ranch Company Inc | Holualoa, HI 96725 | $1,501,677 |
17 | Zbar Ranch LLC | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $1,407,610 |
18 | Harold Frederick Rice Jr | Kamuela, HI 96743 | $1,343,740 |
19 | Darcy David Nobriga | Laupahoehoe, HI 96764 | $1,332,179 |
20 | Palekoki Ranch Inc | Honokaa, HI 96727 | $1,273,719 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>