Non-insured Disaster Assistance in Bannock County, Idaho, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 86
Recipients of Non-insured Disaster Assistance from farms in Bannock County, Idaho totaled $306,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Non-insured Disaster Assistance 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Christine Miller | Pocatello, ID 83204 | $15,049 |
| 2 | Rex Nielsen | Downey, ID 83234 | $14,188 |
| 3 | Andrus Suffolks | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $13,893 |
| 4 | John H Probst | Homer, AK 99603 | $12,423 |
| 5 | Buehlers Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $12,300 |
| 6 | Jayne Kay Probst | Twin Falls, ID 83301 | $10,582 |
| 7 | Ronnie Tillotson | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $9,918 |
| 8 | Brett Casperson | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $8,174 |
| 9 | Shane Irick | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $7,797 |
| 10 | Scott Henderson | Swanlake, ID 83281 | $7,708 |
| 11 | Kenneth Knowles | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $7,622 |
| 12 | Steve Criddle | Downey, ID 83234 | $7,611 |
| 13 | David Stanger | Pocatello, ID 83204 | $7,502 |
| 14 | Ridgedale Ranches Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $7,495 |
| 15 | Christopher Banks | Bancroft, ID 83217 | $7,025 |
| 16 | Thayne Casperson | Bancroft, ID 83217 | $6,979 |
| 17 | Marsh Valley Cattlemen Corp | Arimo, ID 83214 | $6,500 |
| 18 | Jeromey Stanger | Inkom, ID 83245 | $6,280 |
| 19 | Max Hall | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $6,189 |
| 20 | Arkansas Ranches | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $6,066 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf