Counter Cyclical Program in Bannock County, Idaho, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 229
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Bannock County, Idaho totaled $210,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Garden Creek Ranches LLC | Brigham City, UT 84302 | $9,531 |
| 2 | Dale Evans | Arimo, ID 83214 | $8,789 |
| 3 | Mark Bennett | Downey, ID 83234 | $8,507 |
| 4 | Kevin Koester | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $7,066 |
| 5 | Daka Farms Inc | Downey, ID 83234 | $6,877 |
| 6 | Kenneth Degn | Preston, ID 83263 | $5,947 |
| 7 | Ellis E Gilbert | Downey, ID 83234 | $5,169 |
| 8 | Arkansas Ranches | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $4,967 |
| 9 | Rick Armstrong | Pocatello, ID 83204 | $4,185 |
| 10 | Tamo Maynard | Downey, ID 83234 | $4,168 |
| 11 | Kent Hadley | Swanlake, ID 83281 | $4,049 |
| 12 | Merrill Ranch Partnership LLC | Swanlake, ID 83281 | $3,876 |
| 13 | Fish Creek Cattle Company | Pope Valley, CA 94567 | $3,724 |
| 14 | Koester Farms Inc | Lava Hot Springs, ID 83246 | $3,708 |
| 15 | Corwin P Whitworth | Inkom, ID 83245 | $3,353 |
| 16 | S W Kent | Arimo, ID 83214 | $3,121 |
| 17 | Ridgedale Ranches Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $2,899 |
| 18 | Steve Criddle | Downey, ID 83234 | $2,837 |
| 19 | Brian Stanger | Bancroft, ID 83217 | $2,777 |
| 20 | Gloria Kent | Arimo, ID 83214 | $2,767 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf