Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Benewah County, Idaho, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 165
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Benewah County, Idaho totaled $1,229,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coeur D Alene Tribe, The Dba Cda Tribal Farm | Tensed, ID 83870 | $103,154 |
| 2 | Skyline Land & Livestock LLC | Desmet, ID 83824 | $97,273 |
| 3 | Tyler Farms Inc | Plummer, ID 83851 | $71,872 |
| 4 | Haas Farms LLC | St Maries, ID 83861 | $70,674 |
| 5 | Denny Land And Livestock Inc | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $62,775 |
| 6 | Heaton Farms Gen'l Prtshp | Tekoa, WA 99033 | $56,954 |
| 7 | J K Tee Farms Inc | Latah, WA 99018 | $51,484 |
| 8 | Chad Haeg | Plummer, ID 83851 | $50,549 |
| 9 | Daman Bros Gen'l Prtshp | Desmet, ID 83824 | $47,032 |
| 10 | Ron & Jeff Tee Farms Inc | Latah, WA 99018 | $45,676 |
| 11 | Gj Family Farms LLC | Tekoa, WA 99033 | $41,342 |
| 12 | Randy Duncan | Tekoa, WA 99033 | $35,410 |
| 13 | Matthew Horlacher | Rosalia, WA 99170 | $29,416 |
| 14 | Kelly Rambo | Farmington, WA 99128 | $28,332 |
| 15 | David Duncan | Worley, ID 83876 | $25,375 |
| 16 | Hay Farms | Tekoa, WA 99033 | $24,179 |
| 17 | Ford Gumm & Sons Inc | Farmington, WA 99128 | $23,712 |
| 18 | Mc Farms | Tekoa, WA 99033 | $21,764 |
| 19 | J & S Haas Farms Inc | Fairfield, WA 99012 | $20,660 |
| 20 | Mike Mccarver | Tensed, ID 83870 | $18,994 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf