Deficiency Payment in Boundary County, Idaho, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 69
Recipients of Deficiency Payment from farms in Boundary County, Idaho totaled $45,005 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Deficiency Payment 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wayne Tucker Farms | Bonners Ferry, ID 83805 | $8,518 |
| 2 | Figgins Farms Inc | Bonners Ferry, ID 83805 | $5,047 |
| 3 | Howe Farms Inc | Bonners Ferry, ID 83805 | $2,941 |
| 4 | James Ansley | Bonners Ferry, ID 83805 | $2,869 |
| 5 | Larry N Peterson | Bonners Ferry, ID 83805 | $2,834 |
| 6 | Ronald D Wilson | Usk, WA 99180 | $2,697 |
| 7 | Hubbard Farms Inc | Bonners Ferry, ID 83805 | $2,216 |
| 8 | Craig W Hubbard Family Inc | Bonners Ferry, ID 83805 | $2,030 |
| 9 | Rile L Zenier | Bonners Ferry, ID 83805 | $1,508 |
| 10 | John Figgins | Bonners Ferry, ID 83805 | $1,362 |
| 11 | Dewayne Wedel | Bonners Ferry, ID 83805 | $1,308 |
| 12 | Ball Creek Ranch | Bonners Ferry, ID 83805 | $1,300 |
| 13 | Victor Amoth | Bonners Ferry, ID 83805 | $1,269 |
| 14 | Keith Morter | Ione, OR 97843 | $1,162 |
| 15 | Randy Morris | Bonners Ferry, ID 83805 | $986 |
| 16 | T & E Tucker Kv Ranch | Porthill, ID 83853 | $971 |
| 17 | Riverwood Ag Co | Heppner, OR 97836 | $667 |
| 18 | Dallas Amoth | Bonners Ferry, ID 83805 | $486 |
| 19 | Bradley Dillin | Bonners Ferry, ID 83805 | $448 |
| 20 | Myrtle Morris | Bonners Ferry, ID 83805 | $372 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf