Total Conservation Programs in Kootenai County, Idaho, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 55
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Kootenai County, Idaho totaled $316,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Coeur D'alene Tribe | Plummer, ID 83851 | $65,343 |
| 2 | Kootenai Properties Inc | Bear Valley Springs, CA 93561 | $28,702 |
| 3 | Hmillhorn LLC | Worley, ID 83876 | $17,042 |
| 4 | Wes Wagner | Farmington, WA 99128 | $15,614 |
| 5 | Ness Properties LLC | Rockford, WA 99030 | $12,732 |
| 6 | Walter Russell | Riverside, CA 92507 | $10,180 |
| 7 | David Duncan | Worley, ID 83876 | $9,196 |
| 8 | Otto & Hattie Dagefoerde Trust C | Spokane, WA 99201 | $9,051 |
| 9 | F & G Timberlands LLC | Coeur D Alene, ID 83815 | $8,469 |
| 10 | Liberty Fields LLC | Farmington, WA 99128 | $8,379 |
| 11 | Cheryl Fulton Fischer LLC | Spokane, WA 99223 | $7,628 |
| 12 | John Burton | Worley, ID 83876 | $7,399 |
| 13 | Keno Family LLC | Worley, ID 83876 | $7,328 |
| 14 | Fred Muhs | St Maries, ID 83861 | $7,206 |
| 15 | Lampert Land Co LLC | Worley, ID 83876 | $6,852 |
| 16 | J K Tee Farms Inc | Latah, WA 99018 | $6,582 |
| 17 | Robert Auvil | Spokane, WA 99203 | $6,578 |
| 18 | Akers Family LLC | Worley, ID 83876 | $6,507 |
| 19 | Judy Ottosen | Worley, ID 83876 | $6,246 |
| 20 | Cavebay Farms, LLC | Worley, ID 83876 | $4,602 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf