Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Oneida County, Idaho, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 141 to 160 of 235
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Oneida County, Idaho totaled $1,050,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
141 | Terry Davis | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,179 |
142 | Kay Harris | Stone, ID 83252 | $1,175 |
143 | Jones Carol & Deon Family Trust | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,162 |
144 | Doug H Jones | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,141 |
145 | Ervin R Jones | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,129 |
146 | Sheldon P Vaughan | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,098 |
147 | Mcbride Ranches LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,098 |
148 | Spencer H Atkinson | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,085 |
149 | Arne A Jones | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,074 |
150 | Eugene Jones Jr | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,049 |
151 | George Palmer | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,035 |
152 | Samuel Tracey Davis | Malad City, ID 83252 | $1,012 |
153 | Richard Williams | West Valley, UT 84119 | $986 |
154 | A M Farms Lc | Fruit Heights, UT 84037 | $936 |
155 | Dale Thomas | Malad City, ID 83252 | $918 |
156 | Horseshoe A Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $891 |
157 | Andrew Chad Bybee | Soda Springs, ID 83276 | $866 |
158 | Brett C Daniels | North Logan, UT 84341 | $851 |
159 | Eldon John | Malad City, ID 83252 | $846 |
160 | Roy W Neal | Stone, ID 83252 | $842 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”