Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Oneida County, Idaho, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 238
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Oneida County, Idaho totaled $2,308,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | S Bar S Ranch, LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $156,970 |
| 2 | Hubbard Land & Lvstk | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $76,453 |
| 3 | William R Ball Jr | Malad City, ID 83252 | $74,681 |
| 4 | Ngw Ranch LLC | Ogden, UT 84409 | $73,108 |
| 5 | Jeff E Alder | Malad City, ID 83252 | $67,272 |
| 6 | Hillville Farms Inc | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $52,215 |
| 7 | Eliason Livestock LLC | Holbrook, ID 83243 | $51,143 |
| 8 | Tyrell G. Thomas | Malad City, ID 83252 | $47,184 |
| 9 | Willie Cattle Company LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $46,315 |
| 10 | Klm Farms LLC | Grantsville, UT 84029 | $45,388 |
| 11 | Chet Keetch | Malad City, ID 83252 | $43,875 |
| 12 | Firth Cattle Company Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $43,171 |
| 13 | Denton C John | Portage, UT 84331 | $41,676 |
| 14 | Robert D Sorensen | Malad City, ID 83252 | $40,526 |
| 15 | Talbot Family Farms LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $38,561 |
| 16 | Justin E Lake | Malad, ID 83252 | $37,123 |
| 17 | Potter Ranches LLC | Malad City, ID 83252 | $34,535 |
| 18 | Zeldon Nelson | Malta, ID 83342 | $33,773 |
| 19 | Austin Tubbs | Malad City, ID 83252 | $33,279 |
| 20 | Daniel R Daniels | Malad City, ID 83252 | $32,513 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf