Total Conservation Programs in Oneida County, Idaho, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 168
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Oneida County, Idaho totaled $1,896,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Crestview Farms Ag Partnership | Jackson, ID 83350 | $75,163 |
2 | Joe And Ann Jenson Revocable Trust | Arbon, ID 83212 | $49,806 |
3 | Steven J Timmerman | Malad City, ID 83252 | $46,573 |
4 | Robert D Sorensen | Malad City, ID 83252 | $44,203 |
5 | Northwest Farm Credit Service ** | Great Falls, MT 59405 | $42,946 |
6 | Campbell Farm Enterprises Inc | Malta, ID 83342 | $36,886 |
7 | Tyler Webster | Kaysville, UT 84037 | $36,674 |
8 | Wright Brothers Ranches L L C | Malad City, ID 83252 | $35,516 |
9 | D & H Farm Inc | Wellsville, UT 84339 | $34,262 |
10 | Secret Canyon Ranch LLC | Salt Lake City, UT 84109 | $32,854 |
11 | Campbell Land LLC | Malta, ID 83342 | $32,108 |
12 | Rushton Juniper Farms LLC | Magna, UT 84044 | $31,588 |
13 | John L Hoyt | Malad City, ID 83252 | $30,129 |
14 | Wright Bros Partnership | Malad City, ID 83252 | $30,094 |
15 | Donald S And Demona F Evans Estat | Las Vegas, NV 89117 | $30,075 |
16 | Dale F Tubbs | Malad City, ID 83252 | $29,033 |
17 | Max King Family Farms Inc | Malad City, ID 83252 | $28,719 |
18 | Rushton Farms LLC | Magna, UT 84044 | $27,910 |
19 | Sid Clark | Malad City, ID 83252 | $27,328 |
20 | David Richards | Malad City, ID 83252 | $27,203 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>