Emergency Conservation Program in Brown County, Illinois, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 145
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Brown County, Illinois totaled $198,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Charles L Wessel | Trivoli, IL 61569 | $10,521 |
2 | Monmouth Warehouse Services Inc | Monmouth, IL 61462 | $8,000 |
3 | Robert W Snyder | Rushville, IL 62681 | $6,530 |
4 | Joseph F Veith | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $5,162 |
5 | Donald Lee Decker | Clayton, IL 62324 | $4,926 |
6 | Henry D Wegs | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $4,522 |
7 | Vernon Hapke Jr Revocable Trust | Clayton, IL 62324 | $4,045 |
8 | Illinois College | Jacksonville, IL 62650 | $3,951 |
9 | Ronald Schenk | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $3,410 |
10 | Patrick F Tracy | Saint Louis, MO 63131 | $3,268 |
11 | David A Briggs | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $3,079 |
12 | David R Krupps Family Trust | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $3,003 |
13 | Jeffery F Markert | Mt Sterling, IL 62375 | $2,914 |
14 | Lawrence D Veith Est | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $2,869 |
15 | Randy V Griggs | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $2,863 |
16 | Artsons Inc | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $2,810 |
17 | Erica S Scheller | Jacksonville, IL 62650 | $2,752 |
18 | John B Leonard | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $2,588 |
19 | John Ormond | Mount Sterling, IL 62353 | $2,560 |
20 | Ted Markert | Macomb, IL 61455 | $2,527 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>