Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Clark County, Illinois, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,028
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Clark County, Illinois totaled $6,108,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Welsh Swine Productions Inc | Marshall, IL 62441 | $216,660 |
2 | Welsh Ag Enterprises | Marshall, IL 62441 | $152,882 |
3 | Macke Farms LLC | Marshall, IL 62441 | $93,513 |
4 | Schiver Farms Inc | Martinsville, IL 62442 | $76,038 |
5 | J Williams Farms Inc | West Union, IL 62477 | $72,989 |
6 | Cline Farms | Marshall, IL 62441 | $71,185 |
7 | Kenneth Wells & Sons Inc | West Union, IL 62477 | $70,434 |
8 | R & R Farms | Martinsville, IL 62442 | $70,422 |
9 | Triple M Farms | Marshall, IL 62441 | $70,287 |
10 | Ryan Family Partnership Lp | Casey, IL 62420 | $68,308 |
11 | Reh Farms Company Inc | Westfield, IL 62474 | $68,215 |
12 | Ronald E Simonton | Martinsville, IL 62442 | $68,136 |
13 | Gross Farms Inc | Martinsville, IL 62442 | $65,739 |
14 | Yeley Farms Inc | Marshall, IL 62441 | $60,460 |
15 | Joey Newton Parcel | Martinsville, IL 62442 | $60,169 |
16 | Dale Leroy Huisinga | Casey, IL 62420 | $57,933 |
17 | Shirley Nell Huisinga | Casey, IL 62420 | $57,675 |
18 | Stephen Dale Honselman | Casey, IL 62420 | $56,144 |
19 | Dayrel L Hupp | Westfield, IL 62474 | $54,488 |
20 | Jerome Farms Ltd | Martinsville, IL 62442 | $53,976 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>