Total Conservation Programs in Hamilton County, Illinois, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 572
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Hamilton County, Illinois totaled $1,906,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Lakosky Land And Farm Partnership | Keosauqua, IA 52565 | $73,922 |
2 | Peoples National Bank ** | Norris City, IL 62869 | $41,586 |
3 | Justin Z Wallace | Dahlgren, IL 62828 | $37,937 |
4 | Tom Hall | Mc Leansboro, IL 62859 | $34,993 |
5 | Bernard E Mitchell | Enfield, IL 62835 | $31,590 |
6 | Gerald Gray Prince | Mc Leansboro, IL 62859 | $28,027 |
7 | Woodrow Farms Partnership | Springerton, IL 62887 | $26,944 |
8 | Davis Family Living Trust | Conroe, TX 77304 | $26,561 |
9 | Thomas E Mitchell | Enfield, IL 62835 | $26,394 |
10 | Dennis Frey | Dahlgren, IL 62828 | $26,256 |
11 | Michele L Lueke | Mc Leansboro, IL 62859 | $22,511 |
12 | Diane M Mitchell | Enfield, IL 62835 | $20,851 |
13 | John Pat Williams-john Patrick Williams Trust U/a | Enfield, IL 62835 | $20,737 |
14 | Droptine Farms LLC | Pulaski, TN 38478 | $20,694 |
15 | Margaret Knight | Mc Leansboro, IL 62859 | $19,370 |
16 | Alan G Kirsch | Mc Leansboro, IL 62859 | $18,271 |
17 | Daisy Bayler Grantor Trust | Mc Leansboro, IL 62859 | $18,160 |
18 | Heather Browning | Mcleansboro, IL 62859 | $16,931 |
19 | Kenneth A Waier | Mc Leansboro, IL 62859 | $16,852 |
20 | Jerry White | Mc Leansboro, IL 62859 | $16,652 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>