Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Mason County, Illinois, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 70
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Mason County, Illinois totaled $91,271 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Darryl Ebken | Kilbourne, IL 62655 | $14,724 |
| 2 | Robert Martin Farms Inc | Mason City, IL 62664 | $6,186 |
| 3 | Norman Bruce | Mason City, IL 62664 | $4,593 |
| 4 | Brent Behrends | San Jose, IL 62682 | $2,927 |
| 5 | Larry Eldridge | Mason City, IL 62664 | $2,834 |
| 6 | Darrel Behrends | Mason City, IL 62664 | $2,592 |
| 7 | Rick Sonnemaker | Petersburg, IL 62675 | $2,475 |
| 8 | Steven C Bergman | Mason City, IL 62664 | $2,403 |
| 9 | Ron Friend | Havana, IL 62644 | $2,367 |
| 10 | Benjamin E Nannen | Mason City, IL 62664 | $2,111 |
| 11 | Donald Nannen | Mason City, IL 62664 | $2,111 |
| 12 | Neil Parr | Mason City, IL 62664 | $2,064 |
| 13 | John Knoles | Mason City, IL 62664 | $2,025 |
| 14 | Leslie E Mathers III | Peoria Heights, IL 61616 | $2,004 |
| 15 | Allen Blessman Rev Trust | Mason City, IL 62664 | $1,982 |
| 16 | Daniel P Lowman | Mason City, IL 62664 | $1,982 |
| 17 | Robert L Betzelberger | San Jose, IL 62682 | $1,954 |
| 18 | Behrends Farms | Mason City, IL 62664 | $1,679 |
| 19 | Bill Entwistle | Easton, IL 62633 | $1,488 |
| 20 | Lawrence B Meyer | Topeka, IL 61567 | $1,413 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf