Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Pike County, Illinois, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 810
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Pike County, Illinois totaled $10,248,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sny Farms Inc | Hull, IL 62343 | $250,000 |
| 2 | Harvey Bradshaw | Griggsville, IL 62340 | $238,600 |
| 3 | Philip E Bradshaw Rev Trust-phil | Griggsville, IL 62340 | $221,345 |
| 4 | Koeller Farms | New Canton, IL 62356 | $212,586 |
| 5 | Soggy Bottom Sow LLC | Pittsfield, IL 62363 | $199,578 |
| 6 | Gin Ridge Pork LLC | Pittsfield, IL 62363 | $180,665 |
| 7 | 21st Century Pork LLC | Pittsfield, IL 62363 | $166,129 |
| 8 | Strout Crossing LLC | Rockport, IL 62370 | $164,151 |
| 9 | Bushmeyer Farms Partnership | Hull, IL 62343 | $142,219 |
| 10 | Len Wiese Family Partnership | Versailles, IL 62378 | $119,194 |
| 11 | Middle Fork Farms Inc | Perry, IL 62362 | $110,277 |
| 12 | Kirby Guthrie Farms Inc | New Canton, IL 62356 | $106,245 |
| 13 | Mark A Webster Farms Inc | Pleasant Hill, IL 62366 | $95,771 |
| 14 | Marc Lumley Farms Inc | Baylis, IL 62314 | $92,928 |
| 15 | Perry Wells Corp | Pleasant Hill, IL 62366 | $87,006 |
| 16 | Gerard Brothers Inc | Pittsfield, IL 62363 | $85,287 |
| 17 | Lane Wiese Family Partnership | Griggsville, IL 62340 | $81,928 |
| 18 | Wiese Brothers Partnership | Griggsville, IL 62340 | $80,797 |
| 19 | Howland Brothers Partnership | Pearl, IL 62361 | $77,699 |
| 20 | Cody Lee Piper | Griggsville, IL 62340 | $75,371 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf