Loan Deficiency in Wabash County, Illinois, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 944
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Wabash County, Illinois totaled $18,747,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lamont Farms Inc | Crossville, IL 62827 | $124,313 |
42 | Timothy R Hocking | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $121,393 |
43 | Roy Edward Timberlake II | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $121,084 |
44 | George Haase | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $120,637 |
45 | Joseph Tennes | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $117,458 |
46 | Robert P Mounts | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $111,427 |
47 | Clayton L Stevens | Allendale, IL 62410 | $110,424 |
48 | Leland Keith Marriott | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $109,830 |
49 | Bernard Bates | Allendale, IL 62410 | $107,654 |
50 | Rt Farms | West Salem, IL 62476 | $107,049 |
51 | Ernest F Griess | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $101,045 |
52 | Raymond - Peters Rev Peters | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $100,920 |
53 | Tom J Hoffman | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $98,239 |
54 | Eugene R Berberich | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $97,257 |
55 | Glenn A Berberich | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $96,066 |
56 | Daniel A Bosecker Trust | Ellery, IL 62833 | $96,000 |
57 | Pleasant View Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $95,524 |
58 | John W Alka | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $91,905 |
59 | Jed Trapp | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $90,493 |
60 | Lyell Alka | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $90,480 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”