Loan Deficiency in Wabash County, Illinois, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 944
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Wabash County, Illinois totaled $18,747,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stevens Farms | Allendale, IL 62410 | $672,837 |
| 2 | Chris & John F Dunkel Partners | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $417,621 |
| 3 | Alka Farms % Bob Alka | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $393,334 |
| 4 | Allen E Broster | West Salem, IL 62476 | $371,263 |
| 5 | Trapp Farms Inc | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $348,247 |
| 6 | Kevin Raber Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $336,093 |
| 7 | Dan Strine Farms Inc | West Salem, IL 62476 | $331,457 |
| 8 | Baumgart Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $319,148 |
| 9 | Larry G Hocking | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $303,089 |
| 10 | Stephen E Tombaugh | Allendale, IL 62410 | $302,628 |
| 11 | Hocking Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $295,535 |
| 12 | Charles Tennis | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $269,982 |
| 13 | Level Acres Inc | West Salem, IL 62476 | $257,801 |
| 14 | John Haase | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $247,913 |
| 15 | Robert Haase Farms Inc | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $245,454 |
| 16 | Fred Berberich | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $242,716 |
| 17 | Slr Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $238,864 |
| 18 | Hill View Farms Inc | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $229,132 |
| 19 | G E Buchanan Farms | Allendale, IL 62410 | $225,502 |
| 20 | Schonaman Farms | Browns, IL 62818 | $215,113 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf