Market Loss Assistance Program in Wabash County, Illinois, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 828
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Wabash County, Illinois totaled $6,716,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hill View Farms Inc | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $73,237 |
22 | Michael Steckler | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $71,168 |
23 | Fred Steckler | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $71,168 |
24 | L Todd Hocking | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $70,746 |
25 | Fred Berberich | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $65,811 |
26 | Charles F Higgins | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $65,371 |
27 | Matthew Hocking | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $65,177 |
28 | Schonaman Farms | Browns, IL 62818 | $61,098 |
29 | George Haase | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $60,433 |
30 | Bernard Bates | Allendale, IL 62410 | $60,030 |
31 | R Richard Alka | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $58,206 |
32 | Tennis Dairy Farms Lp | Browns, IL 62818 | $57,455 |
33 | Larry D Seals | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $56,453 |
34 | Kevin L Litherland | Allendale, IL 62410 | $53,991 |
35 | Gerald R Hocking | Browns, IL 62818 | $49,840 |
36 | David Ralph Kelsey | Allendale, IL 62410 | $48,387 |
37 | Paul Bates | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $47,940 |
38 | Billy Root | West Salem, IL 62476 | $47,693 |
39 | Eugene R Berberich | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $47,330 |
40 | James I Tennis | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $47,258 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”