Total Commodity Programs in Wabash County, Illinois, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 464
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wabash County, Illinois totaled $7,693,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hill View Farms Inc | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $111,614 |
22 | Berberosa Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $101,595 |
23 | Eric James Strine | West Salem, IL 62476 | $91,910 |
24 | Litherland Excavating Inc | Allendale, IL 62410 | $88,057 |
25 | Robert Trapp Farms Inc | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $83,494 |
26 | Gene Bates | Allendale, IL 62410 | $82,557 |
27 | Dwr Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $81,505 |
28 | Chad A Broster | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $80,477 |
29 | Alka Family Farms LLC | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $79,307 |
30 | Keith Kolb | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $75,396 |
31 | Joseph Tennes | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $71,314 |
32 | Gerald R Hocking | Browns, IL 62818 | $69,151 |
33 | Leland Keith Marriott | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $68,565 |
34 | Willis Stanley Kelsey | Allendale, IL 62410 | $67,256 |
35 | Donald Schonaman | Browns, IL 62818 | $65,672 |
36 | Matthew Hocking | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $63,496 |
37 | Robert C Alka | Lawrenceville, IL 62439 | $61,351 |
38 | L Todd Hocking | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $59,860 |
39 | Kent E Broster | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $54,577 |
40 | Peters Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $52,200 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”