Total Commodity Programs in Wabash County, Illinois, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 456
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wabash County, Illinois totaled $6,387,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Level Acres Inc | West Salem, IL 62476 | $311,976 |
| 2 | Baumgart Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $272,519 |
| 3 | Highland Farms Inc | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $261,283 |
| 4 | Bates Brothers LLC | Allendale, IL 62410 | $254,576 |
| 5 | Rt Farms | West Salem, IL 62476 | $233,208 |
| 6 | Hocking Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $193,685 |
| 7 | Slr Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $178,213 |
| 8 | Stanley Kelsey | Allendale, IL 62410 | $174,064 |
| 9 | Buchanan Farms | Allendale, IL 62410 | $173,393 |
| 10 | John Haase | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $150,832 |
| 11 | Trapp Farms Inc | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $135,592 |
| 12 | Allen E Broster | West Salem, IL 62476 | $133,792 |
| 13 | Hill View Farms Inc | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $128,432 |
| 14 | Kevin Raber Farms | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $127,039 |
| 15 | Joshua E Vanmatre | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $125,719 |
| 16 | Chris & John F Dunkel Partners | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $100,687 |
| 17 | Joseph Tennes | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $99,362 |
| 18 | Cusick Farms | Saint Francisville, IL 62460 | $99,267 |
| 19 | Willis Stanley Kelsey | Allendale, IL 62410 | $87,582 |
| 20 | Alka Family Farms LLC | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $87,400 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf