Total Conservation Programs in Bartholomew County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 765
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Bartholomew County, Indiana totaled $15,502,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Robert Finkel | Hope, IN 47246 | $606,509 |
2 | Lynn-finkel-kellegha Karl Finkel | Jackson, WY 83002 | $558,785 |
3 | Shane Meier Farms Inc | Elizabethtown, IN 47232 | $340,750 |
4 | Arnholt Brothers LLC | Columbus, IN 47203 | $286,042 |
5 | Hope Hardwoods Inc | Hope, IN 47246 | $268,189 |
6 | Frank Henry Fiesbeck | Columbus, IN 47201 | $158,472 |
7 | Tricia Meier | Elizabethtown, IN 47232 | $154,892 |
8 | K & G Farms Inc | Columbus, IN 47203 | $152,871 |
9 | Sudan Farms Inc | Columbus, IN 47203 | $150,694 |
10 | Larry Borgman | Columbus, IN 47201 | $144,769 |
11 | C Ann Anthers | Elizabethtown, IN 47232 | $144,758 |
12 | Daugherty Farm | Columbus, IN 47201 | $134,240 |
13 | H&m Middendorf Farms | Columbus, IN 47201 | $128,025 |
14 | Marshall Middendorf | Columbus, IN 47201 | $127,674 |
15 | Meyer Hog Farm | Columbus, IN 47201 | $124,365 |
16 | Albert Suhre O'connor | Columbus, IN 47203 | $122,671 |
17 | L & C Burbrink Corp | Columbus, IN 47201 | $118,564 |
18 | Glick Farms Inc | Hartsville, IN 47244 | $112,510 |
19 | Henry Wischmeier | Columbus, IN 47201 | $109,989 |
20 | Lynn K Finkel-finkel-kelleghan Family Trust | Jackson, WY 83002 | $108,612 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>