Total Conservation Programs in Blackford County, Indiana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 97
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Blackford County, Indiana totaled $273,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | William L Hiday | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $28,054 |
2 | Timothy L Van Gordon | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $26,130 |
3 | Thomas P. & Joyce A. Gearheart Keystone Trust | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $25,243 |
4 | Love Family Farm LLC | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $21,216 |
5 | Thomas E Cale Trust | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $18,819 |
6 | T Eric Evans | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $15,137 |
7 | Teddy D Tarr | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $12,568 |
8 | Norma G Donathan Estate | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $8,095 |
9 | Jerry Hanlin | Pennville, IN 47369 | $6,800 |
10 | James L Garrison | Fortville, IN 46040 | $6,748 |
11 | Brian G Conner | Montpelier, IN 47359 | $6,193 |
12 | Jtm Family Limited Partnership | Noblesville, IN 46062 | $5,627 |
13 | Clamme Cattle Corp | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $5,144 |
14 | Catherine H Decker | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $4,842 |
15 | Paul D Oswalt | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $3,976 |
16 | Kenneth E Earls | Muncie, IN 47302 | $3,367 |
17 | Melin Farms Inc | Bluffton, IN 46714 | $3,366 |
18 | Francis E Woods | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $3,156 |
19 | Brian D Goodspeed | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $3,118 |
20 | Oswalt Stone & Gravel | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $2,758 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>