Loan Deficiency in Gibson County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,867
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Gibson County, Indiana totaled $37,737,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Bingham Farms | Patoka, IN 47666 | $492,062 |
2 | Schmitt Farms | Haubstadt, IN 47639 | $415,781 |
3 | Ziliak Enterprises | Haubstadt, IN 47639 | $415,116 |
4 | Kihi Farms Inc | Princeton, IN 47670 | $391,435 |
5 | Tom Helfrich | Haubstadt, IN 47639 | $383,281 |
6 | Kenneth Stunkel | Haubstadt, IN 47639 | $350,370 |
7 | Alan Sensmeier Farms Inc | Owensville, IN 47665 | $343,851 |
8 | Hirsch Family Farm Inc | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $331,223 |
9 | Steelman Farms Inc | Patoka, IN 47666 | $326,497 |
10 | Wm Clark Bugher | Patoka, IN 47666 | $323,827 |
11 | Marvel Family Farms Inc | Princeton, IN 47670 | $319,383 |
12 | Edward D Horrall | Patoka, IN 47666 | $313,148 |
13 | Fuhs Bros Farms | Fort Branch, IN 47648 | $308,480 |
14 | J R B Grain Inc | Cynthiana, IN 47612 | $307,956 |
15 | Edward Mason | Owensville, IN 47665 | $292,181 |
16 | Robert Townsend | Princeton, IN 47670 | $288,742 |
17 | Heidenreich Farms Inc | Princeton, IN 47670 | $285,450 |
18 | Don Pflug Farms Inc | Oakland City, IN 47660 | $284,212 |
19 | Robert Haase Farms Inc | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $282,265 |
20 | David L Haase Revocable Trust | Mount Carmel, IL 62863 | $279,761 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>