Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Hamilton County, Indiana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 222
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Hamilton County, Indiana totaled $1,448,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Rand A Woodward | Noblesville, IN 46062 | $82,555 |
2 | Law Brothers Partnership | Atlanta, IN 46031 | $79,222 |
3 | Rulon Enterprises LLC | Arcadia, IN 46030 | $75,692 |
4 | David Musselman | Noblesville, IN 46060 | $36,042 |
5 | Johnson Grain Farms Inc | Atlanta, IN 46031 | $34,361 |
6 | W Lee Egler Farms Inc | Noblesville, IN 46062 | $32,119 |
7 | Coverdale Farm Partnership | Noblesville, IN 46060 | $31,927 |
8 | Bergman Farms LLC | Tipton, IN 46072 | $31,162 |
9 | Arthur L Johnson | Fishers, IN 46037 | $30,551 |
10 | Carey & Sons Inc | Sheridan, IN 46069 | $29,366 |
11 | Flanders A-maizing Grain Inc | Noblesville, IN 46060 | $26,481 |
12 | Jerry L Brown | Cicero, IN 46034 | $24,478 |
13 | Webster Family Inc | Sheridan, IN 46069 | $24,382 |
14 | Matthew W Jackson | Arcadia, IN 46030 | $23,555 |
15 | Gerald A Kakasuleff | Cicero, IN 46034 | $22,621 |
16 | Beacon Credit Union ** | Wabash, IN 46992 | $22,562 |
17 | Kelvin Osborne | Sheridan, IN 46069 | $21,453 |
18 | J & K Stafford Farms LLC | Kempton, IN 46049 | $21,292 |
19 | William R Clark | Cicero, IN 46034 | $20,668 |
20 | Nancy O Kakasuleff | Cicero, IN 46034 | $20,611 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>