Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Henry County, Indiana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 116
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Henry County, Indiana totaled $177,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jake Martin | New Castle, IN 47362 | $21,609 |
| 2 | Justin Day | Middletown, IN 47356 | $19,508 |
| 3 | Yanos Family Farm Inc | Straughn, IN 47387 | $8,135 |
| 4 | Kent Koger | New Castle, IN 47362 | $6,234 |
| 5 | Kristi Koger | New Castle, IN 47362 | $6,234 |
| 6 | David Chambers | New Castle, IN 47362 | $5,707 |
| 7 | Agri Business Finance ** | St Paris, OH 43072 | $4,574 |
| 8 | Scott T Trennepohl | Middletown, IN 47356 | $4,260 |
| 9 | Jeffery D Trennepohl | Middletown, IN 47356 | $4,154 |
| 10 | Brent Fairchild | New Castle, IN 47362 | $4,066 |
| 11 | John Z Esh Jr | New Castle, IN 47362 | $4,011 |
| 12 | Kyle Jared Becker | Mooreland, IN 47360 | $2,835 |
| 13 | Randy Halcomb | Spiceland, IN 47385 | $2,736 |
| 14 | Kent L Moore | Mooreland, IN 47360 | $2,727 |
| 15 | Andrew Logan Moore | New Castle, IN 47362 | $2,727 |
| 16 | Julie D Halcomb | Spiceland, IN 47385 | $2,719 |
| 17 | Luellen Family Farms Inc | Mooreland, IN 47360 | $2,709 |
| 18 | Danny Pugsley | Middletown, IN 47356 | $2,610 |
| 19 | Danny Ray Pugsley | Middletown, IN 47356 | $2,603 |
| 20 | Seth Matthew Johnson | Knightstown, IN 46148 | $2,586 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf