Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Jackson County, Indiana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 554
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Jackson County, Indiana totaled $3,457,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Myers Sod Farm LLC | Seymour, IN 47274 | $150,120 |
2 | B&a Thompson Grain Farm Inc | Seymour, IN 47274 | $72,747 |
3 | D&b Pfaffenberger & Sons Inc | Seymour, IN 47274 | $49,551 |
4 | Brian D Schroer | Brownstown, IN 47220 | $49,482 |
5 | Michelle R Schroer | Brownstown, IN 47220 | $49,482 |
6 | Joe Schepman Farms Inc | Seymour, IN 47274 | $44,801 |
7 | James R Lucas Farms LLC | Freetown, IN 47235 | $43,262 |
8 | Pollert Farms Grain & Livestock LLC | Seymour, IN 47274 | $43,054 |
9 | C T Livestock LLC | Seymour, IN 47274 | $42,683 |
10 | Timothy J Tiemeyer | Vallonia, IN 47281 | $41,880 |
11 | Triple Valley Farms Inc | Brownstown, IN 47220 | $41,859 |
12 | Troy Burnside | Vallonia, IN 47281 | $39,713 |
13 | David Otting | Medora, IN 47260 | $37,327 |
14 | Taylor Noble Wischmeier | Brownstown, IN 47220 | $36,941 |
15 | Chad D Darlage | Seymour, IN 47274 | $36,161 |
16 | Stahl Farms Inc | Brownstown, IN 47220 | $34,620 |
17 | Newkirk Inc | Seymour, IN 47274 | $33,893 |
18 | Gregory D Mcpike | Medora, IN 47260 | $32,943 |
19 | Clayton Klosterman | Seymour, IN 47274 | $32,703 |
20 | Steve Wischmeier | Brownstown, IN 47220 | $32,701 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>