Farm Subsidy information
Jennings County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Jennings County, Indiana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 441
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jennings County, Indiana totaled $6,236,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Graham Creek Farms | Commiskey, IN 47227 | $184,319 |
2 | Gasper Farms Partnership | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $177,687 |
3 | Schepman Farms General Partnership | Crothersville, IN 47229 | $116,859 |
4 | L&h Wischmeier General Partnership | Columbus, IN 47201 | $99,453 |
5 | Meaghan Speer | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $84,446 |
6 | Walter Leon Speer | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $79,946 |
7 | Red Fox Farms | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $76,958 |
8 | Vogel Farms Inc | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $65,862 |
9 | Jody Ford | Dupont, IN 47231 | $61,802 |
10 | Kevin Boggs | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $54,803 |
11 | T & S Farms Inc | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $47,696 |
12 | Charles Wm Beesley | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $45,477 |
13 | Charles Jr & Crissy Beesley Inc | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $43,383 |
14 | Gary Speer Family Farms LLC | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $40,244 |
15 | John A Maschino | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $38,541 |
16 | Jeff Maschino | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $36,848 |
17 | Debbie Ford | Dupont, IN 47231 | $36,502 |
18 | Dean Ford | Dupont, IN 47231 | $36,498 |
19 | Gt Vogel Farms Inc | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $36,412 |
20 | Kent Brothers | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $34,309 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>