Total Commodity Programs in Jennings County, Indiana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 313
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Jennings County, Indiana totaled $4,174,000 in in 2019.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Graham Creek Farms | Commiskey, IN 47227 | $477,755 |
| 2 | Gasper Farms Partnership | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $208,963 |
| 3 | Gary Speer Family Farms LLC | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $176,732 |
| 4 | Jody Ford | Dupont, IN 47231 | $153,443 |
| 5 | Kevin Boggs | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $124,174 |
| 6 | Frank G Helt | Scipio, IN 47273 | $114,074 |
| 7 | John A Maschino | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $110,684 |
| 8 | Agri Business Finance ** | St Paris, OH 43072 | $103,666 |
| 9 | Charles Jr & Crissy Beesley Inc | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $97,193 |
| 10 | Charles Wm Beesley | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $94,707 |
| 11 | T & S Farms Inc | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $86,108 |
| 12 | Dale Koelmel | Butlerville, IN 47223 | $79,019 |
| 13 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $74,868 |
| 14 | William Buck Brooks | Seymour, IN 47274 | $70,811 |
| 15 | Meaghan Speer | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $67,680 |
| 16 | Walter Leon Speer | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $67,679 |
| 17 | Kent Brothers | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $62,897 |
| 18 | Vogel Farms Inc | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $60,504 |
| 19 | Larry Maschino | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $50,973 |
| 20 | Roy W Herr | North Vernon, IN 47265 | $50,669 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf