Conservation Reserve Program in Kosciusko County, Indiana, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 297
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Kosciusko County, Indiana totaled $1,115,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Lucas S Reed | Winona Lake, IN 46590 | $6,883 |
42 | Robert C Stump Jr | Warsaw, IN 46582 | $6,637 |
43 | Mcsherry Farms Inc | Claypool, IN 46510 | $6,385 |
44 | Lois Gearhart Trust | Warsaw, IN 46582 | $6,382 |
45 | Michael P Whitaker | Claypool, IN 46510 | $6,267 |
46 | Hammer Family Limited Partnership | Louisville, KY 40241 | $6,189 |
47 | Grossnickle Farms Llp | Warsaw, IN 46580 | $6,028 |
48 | Sponseller Brothers Inc | Atwood, IN 46502 | $5,994 |
49 | Brian Stichter | Leesburg, IN 46538 | $5,945 |
50 | Norman Drudge & Vera Drudge Joint Revocable Living | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $5,823 |
51 | Glenn Pfleiderer | Winona Lake, IN 46590 | $5,767 |
52 | Ronald Warren | Claypool, IN 46510 | $5,743 |
53 | Ellis David Marshall | Warsaw, IN 46580 | $5,639 |
54 | Marko Dumlija | Tinley Park, IL 60487 | $5,630 |
55 | , | $5,617 | |
56 | Bryan Todd Hughes | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $5,471 |
57 | Pyle Family LLC | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $5,430 |
58 | Kevin Ousley | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $5,373 |
59 | Ted Eherenman Family Trust | Larwill, IN 46764 | $5,368 |
60 | Kevin Deardorff | Claypool, IN 46510 | $5,274 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”