Conservation Reserve Program in Kosciusko County, Indiana, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 310
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Kosciusko County, Indiana totaled $1,306,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Roberta Bradford | Warsaw, IN 46582 | $7,765 |
42 | Sponseller Brothers Inc | Atwood, IN 46502 | $7,607 |
43 | Lyle Faulkner II | Nappanee, IN 46550 | $7,548 |
44 | , | $7,351 | |
45 | Kevin N Hohman Trust | Silver Lake, IN 46982 | $7,345 |
46 | David Smith | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $7,335 |
47 | Larry Polk | Leesburg, IN 46538 | $7,209 |
48 | Robert C Schlag Jr | Warsaw, IN 46580 | $7,185 |
49 | , | $7,141 | |
50 | Lucas S Reed | Winona Lake, IN 46590 | $6,883 |
51 | Tim Kuhn | Claypool, IN 46510 | $6,865 |
52 | Robert C Stump Jr | Warsaw, IN 46582 | $6,637 |
53 | Mcsherry Farms Inc | Claypool, IN 46510 | $6,385 |
54 | Lois Gearhart Trust | Warsaw, IN 46582 | $6,382 |
55 | Michael P Whitaker | Claypool, IN 46510 | $6,267 |
56 | Hammer Family Limited Partnership | Louisville, KY 40241 | $6,189 |
57 | Brian Stichter | Leesburg, IN 46538 | $5,945 |
58 | Pyle Family LLC | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $5,897 |
59 | Gearhart Irrevocable Family Trust | Westfield, IN 46074 | $5,884 |
60 | Norman Drudge & Vera Drudge Joint Revocable Living | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $5,823 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”