Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in La Porte County, Indiana, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 608
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in La Porte County, Indiana totaled $3,378,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Baltes Farms LLC | Rolling Prairie, IN 46371 | $135,994 |
2 | Wykoff Bros Farms Inc | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $57,181 |
3 | Schafer Farms Partnership | La Crosse, IN 46348 | $51,981 |
4 | Bannwart Farms Inc | North Liberty, IN 46554 | $46,507 |
5 | Gorski Farms Partnership | La Crosse, IN 46348 | $44,663 |
6 | Niksch Farms Ltd | Westville, IN 46391 | $43,641 |
7 | Livinghouse Farms Inc | La Porte, IN 46350 | $40,708 |
8 | Rice Farms LLC | Wanatah, IN 46390 | $37,449 |
9 | Jesswein Operating LLC | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $36,911 |
10 | Koehn Farms Inc | La Porte, IN 46350 | $36,611 |
11 | Minich Dairy Farm | La Porte, IN 46350 | $35,460 |
12 | Cuson Farms Inc | Mill Creek, IN 46365 | $35,215 |
13 | Triple M Dairy LLC | Laporte, IN 46350 | $34,276 |
14 | Richard Zolvinski | La Porte, IN 46350 | $33,358 |
15 | Paarlberg Farms | Rolling Prairie, IN 46371 | $33,284 |
16 | R & J Gumz Farms Inc | North Judson, IN 46366 | $32,758 |
17 | David V And Douglas K Wolf Farm Partnership | Wanatah, IN 46390 | $29,913 |
18 | Busse Farms Inc | Hanna, IN 46340 | $28,554 |
19 | Joseph R Zolvinski | Michigan City, IN 46360 | $28,509 |
20 | Martin Barr | La Porte, IN 46350 | $27,543 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>