Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in La Porte County, Indiana, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 622
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in La Porte County, Indiana totaled $2,559,000 in in 2020.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schafer Farms Partnership | La Crosse, IN 46348 | $37,252 |
| 2 | Gorski Farms Partnership | La Crosse, IN 46348 | $36,184 |
| 3 | Cuson Farms Inc | Mill Creek, IN 46365 | $34,801 |
| 4 | Wykoff Bros Farms Inc | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $34,589 |
| 5 | Tom Peeples | Hamlet, IN 46532 | $31,167 |
| 6 | Rice Farms LLC | Wanatah, IN 46390 | $31,077 |
| 7 | Paarlberg Farms | Rolling Prairie, IN 46371 | $30,610 |
| 8 | David P Sabones | Walkerton, IN 46574 | $30,043 |
| 9 | Beacon Credit Union ** | Wabash, IN 46992 | $29,724 |
| 10 | Livinghouse Farms Inc | La Porte, IN 46350 | $29,417 |
| 11 | Jesswein Operating LLC | New Carlisle, IN 46552 | $29,139 |
| 12 | Bannwart Farms Inc | North Liberty, IN 46554 | $26,951 |
| 13 | Martin Barr | La Porte, IN 46350 | $26,741 |
| 14 | Marsha Barr | La Porte, IN 46350 | $26,741 |
| 15 | Wil-o-way Farms Inc | Union Mills, IN 46382 | $25,344 |
| 16 | Baltes Farms LLC | Rolling Prairie, IN 46371 | $25,205 |
| 17 | Tuholski Farms Inc | Mill Creek, IN 46365 | $25,188 |
| 18 | Daube Farms Inc | Walkerton, IN 46574 | $24,552 |
| 19 | Koehn Farms Inc | La Porte, IN 46350 | $24,398 |
| 20 | R & J Gumz Farms Inc | North Judson, IN 46366 | $24,167 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf