Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) in Putnam County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 156
Recipients of Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) from farms in Putnam County, Indiana totaled $3,273,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Average Crop Revenue Election Program (ACRE) 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | White Oak Farms | Cloverdale, IN 46120 | $387,064 |
2 | Ames 4k Farms | Fillmore, IN 46128 | $317,717 |
3 | Mccammack Farms | Cloverdale, IN 46120 | $185,426 |
4 | James L Mcgaughey Farms Inc | Bainbridge, IN 46105 | $120,892 |
5 | Hillside Farms Inc | Bainbridge, IN 46105 | $108,402 |
6 | Britton Farms Inc | Louisville, KY 40299 | $101,036 |
7 | Double R Farms LLC | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $100,003 |
8 | Cedar View Farm LLC | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $98,318 |
9 | Abe Hodgen | Roachdale, IN 46172 | $74,138 |
10 | Shirley Hodgen | Roachdale, IN 46172 | $73,912 |
11 | Charles Butler Family Farm LLC | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $69,973 |
12 | Oakalla Valley | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $69,558 |
13 | Legan Livestock & Grain Inc | Coatesville, IN 46121 | $63,068 |
14 | J-d Acre Farms | Fillmore, IN 46128 | $54,096 |
15 | Kent Brattain | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $53,256 |
16 | Ray A Neier | Roachdale, IN 46172 | $51,183 |
17 | David Ferrand | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $50,689 |
18 | David Rowings | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $50,181 |
19 | H Jean Rowings | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $46,177 |
20 | Lantrip Farms LLC | Coatesville, IN 46121 | $44,480 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>