Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Putnam County, Indiana, 2019
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 231
Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Putnam County, Indiana totaled $139,000 in in 2019.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program 2019 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | White Oak Farms | Cloverdale, IN 46120 | $12,709 |
2 | Merlin Martin | Clayton, IN 46118 | $5,167 |
3 | Sandra Martin | Clayton, IN 46118 | $5,167 |
4 | Cedar View Farm LLC | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $4,748 |
5 | Arnold Farms Gp | Quincy, IN 47456 | $4,467 |
6 | Greendale Farms LLC | Morristown, NJ 07960 | $4,353 |
7 | J-d Acre Farms | Fillmore, IN 46128 | $3,775 |
8 | Mccammack Farms | Cloverdale, IN 46120 | $3,498 |
9 | Britton Farms Inc | Louisville, KY 40299 | $2,608 |
10 | Ames 4k Farms | Fillmore, IN 46128 | $2,437 |
11 | E A & J Cantonwine Inc | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $2,392 |
12 | William R Fordice | Russellville, IN 46175 | $2,286 |
13 | Charles Butler Family Farm LLC | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $2,150 |
14 | Larry A Salsman | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $1,962 |
15 | Lantrip Farms LLC | Coatesville, IN 46121 | $1,479 |
16 | Kenneth Shupe | Stilesville, IN 46180 | $1,471 |
17 | Curtis Wrightsman D/b/a Wrightsman Farms | Russellville, IN 46175 | $1,443 |
18 | Heather S Poynter | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $1,392 |
19 | Ray W Poynter Jr | Greencastle, IN 46135 | $1,388 |
20 | Marshall G Hurst | Danville, IN 46122 | $1,379 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>