Miscellaneous Conservation Programs in Vigo County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 18 of 18
Recipients of Miscellaneous Conservation Programs from farms in Vigo County, Indiana totaled $49,410 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Miscellaneous Conservation Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Sisters Of Providence | Saint Mary Of The Wo, IN 47876 | $10,963 |
2 | Princeton Mining Co | Sullivan, IN 47882 | $8,722 |
3 | Dorothy Leach | Tucker, GA 30084 | $3,500 |
4 | Rex Gene Dalton | Sullivan, IN 47882 | $3,500 |
5 | Charles Felling | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $3,500 |
6 | Burch Harlan Co Inc | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $3,500 |
7 | Marilyn W Pendergast | Terre Haute, IN 47808 | $2,244 |
8 | Gregory A Jeffers | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $1,780 |
9 | Frank L Miklozek Jr | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $1,772 |
10 | Hale C Jeffers | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $1,684 |
11 | Chas K Mccrory | Terre Haute, IN 47808 | $1,393 |
12 | William H Roberts | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $1,344 |
13 | Gilbert R Elliott | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $1,205 |
14 | Fenton Farms C/o Phil Baker | Midland, MI 48642 | $1,100 |
15 | Quentin Jeffries | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $888 |
16 | David L Cottom Revocable Trust | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $823 |
17 | Roy M Woodsmall | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $746 |
18 | Bill Woodsmall | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $746 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”