Conservation Reserve Program in Vigo County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 330
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Vigo County, Indiana totaled $5,971,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dorothy Leach | Tucker, GA 30084 | $53,878 |
22 | Robert S Green | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $53,402 |
23 | Piety Farms Inc | Zephyrhills, FL 33541 | $52,843 |
24 | Tomi K Higginbotham | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $47,778 |
25 | Wm Craig Farmer | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $47,188 |
26 | B Stuart Farmer | Jersey City, NJ 07302 | $47,185 |
27 | Lila Waugh | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $46,870 |
28 | Larry Gormong | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $46,637 |
29 | Phillip R Hammond | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $45,791 |
30 | Max Gibson | Terre Haute, IN 47808 | $43,766 |
31 | Frank L Miklozek Jr | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $42,961 |
32 | Mars Harlan | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $41,017 |
33 | Phil Bird | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $40,206 |
34 | Jack L Ross Jr | West Terre Haute, IN 47885 | $38,193 |
35 | Hulman & Co | Terre Haute, IN 47807 | $37,202 |
36 | Jackie Strain | Farmersburg, IN 47850 | $36,228 |
37 | Gary P Walker | Paris, IL 61944 | $36,117 |
38 | Charles E Freeman | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $34,623 |
39 | Kurt Hamilton | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $34,255 |
40 | Joe Sturgeon | Terre Haute, IN 47802 | $34,049 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”