Farm Subsidy information
Wabash County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Wabash County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,490
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Wabash County, Indiana totaled $246,419,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Vada Farm Inc | Wabash, IN 46992 | $785,391 |
42 | John Ronnie Peebles | Wabash, IN 46992 | $770,528 |
43 | Bowman Farms LLC | La Fontaine, IN 46940 | $757,813 |
44 | Lowell Lindzy | Silver Lake, IN 46982 | $756,002 |
45 | Alan Brubaker | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $755,257 |
46 | M & C Hill Farms Inc. | Huntington, IN 46750 | $745,766 |
47 | Bill Runkel | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $745,678 |
48 | Scott A Schuler | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $740,270 |
49 | Matthew J Whitesel | Wabash, IN 46992 | $720,009 |
50 | Merrick Farms LLC | Wabash, IN 46992 | $714,987 |
51 | Roger Peebles | Wabash, IN 46992 | $698,788 |
52 | John P Schuler | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $696,436 |
53 | Christian M Rosen | Urbana, IN 46990 | $682,152 |
54 | Dean Stouffer | Wabash, IN 46992 | $681,963 |
55 | Nelson Dyson | Wabash, IN 46992 | $676,555 |
56 | Stanley Dyson | Wabash, IN 46992 | $670,055 |
57 | Floor Ag Inc | Silver Lake, IN 46982 | $665,623 |
58 | Dennis Byers | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $664,480 |
59 | Scott A Smith | Silver Lake, IN 46982 | $660,003 |
60 | Jon R Rosen | Urbana, IN 46990 | $646,545 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”