Total Commodity Programs in Wabash County, Indiana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 502
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wabash County, Indiana totaled $3,927,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bowman Farms | La Fontaine, IN 46940 | $177,710 |
| 2 | Treaty Dairy LLC | La Fontaine, IN 46940 | $120,508 |
| 3 | M & C Hill Farms Inc. | Huntington, IN 46750 | $113,458 |
| 4 | Mckillip Seeds Inc | Wabash, IN 46992 | $95,997 |
| 5 | Merrick Farms LLC | Wabash, IN 46992 | $63,895 |
| 6 | Floor Ag Inc | Silver Lake, IN 46982 | $61,291 |
| 7 | Runkel Farms | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $57,289 |
| 8 | Alan Schroll | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $56,001 |
| 9 | Mike Schuler Farms LLC | Roann, IN 46974 | $54,931 |
| 10 | Vada Farm Inc | Wabash, IN 46992 | $50,735 |
| 11 | Greg A Michel | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $47,552 |
| 12 | Nathan Vrooman | Wabash, IN 46992 | $47,085 |
| 13 | Bechtold Farms Inc | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $46,684 |
| 14 | Kratzer Farms Inc | La Fontaine, IN 46940 | $44,538 |
| 15 | Winger Farms LLC | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $43,640 |
| 16 | Dale Farms Inc | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $43,083 |
| 17 | Reed Farms | Andrews, IN 46702 | $42,172 |
| 18 | Darrell Penrod | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $42,160 |
| 19 | Liberty Acres Inc | La Fontaine, IN 46940 | $42,034 |
| 20 | Haupert Livestock Enterprise | Urbana, IN 46990 | $41,038 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf