Total Commodity Programs in Wabash County, Indiana, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 576
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wabash County, Indiana totaled $15,928,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dale Farms Inc | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $1,132,999 |
2 | Midwest Veal LLC | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $756,146 |
3 | Treaty Dairy LLC | La Fontaine, IN 46940 | $743,404 |
4 | M & C Hill Farms Inc. | Huntington, IN 46750 | $572,908 |
5 | Bowman Farms | La Fontaine, IN 46940 | $536,992 |
6 | Midwest Poultry Services L P | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $470,855 |
7 | Beacon Credit Union ** | Wabash, IN 46992 | $274,652 |
8 | Richard Brovont | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $268,933 |
9 | Mckillip Seeds Inc | Wabash, IN 46992 | $238,281 |
10 | Runkel Farms | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $226,144 |
11 | 2001 Inc | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $225,068 |
12 | Floor Ag Inc | Silver Lake, IN 46982 | $199,053 |
13 | P & L Wilson Farms Inc | Wabash, IN 46992 | $191,324 |
14 | Kratzer Farms Inc | La Fontaine, IN 46940 | $189,858 |
15 | Nathan Vrooman | Wabash, IN 46992 | $182,572 |
16 | Haupert Family Farms Inc | Wabash, IN 46992 | $177,461 |
17 | R B Agri Enterprise LLC | Lagro, IN 46941 | $166,006 |
18 | Reed Farms | Andrews, IN 46702 | $160,457 |
19 | Bechtold Farms Inc | N Manchester, IN 46962 | $157,488 |
20 | Haupert Livestock Enterprise | Urbana, IN 46990 | $156,044 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>