Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Wells County, Indiana, 2020
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 557
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Wells County, Indiana totaled $7,142,000 in in 2020.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2020 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Fiechter Family Livestock LLC | Bryant, IN 47326 | $481,988 |
2 | Mlc Farms | Bluffton, IN 46714 | $312,501 |
3 | Victor W Reinhard | Bluffton, IN 46714 | $250,000 |
4 | Neu-hope Dairy Inc Fka Neuenscwander Heifer Raisin | Bluffton, IN 46714 | $246,210 |
5 | Cornerstone Swine LLC | Bluffton, IN 46714 | $150,000 |
6 | Kober Family Ag LLC | Liberty Center, IN 46766 | $117,972 |
7 | Beavans Farms Inc | Poneto, IN 46781 | $110,350 |
8 | Sunny Park Dairy Inc | Bluffton, IN 46714 | $105,262 |
9 | Parlor City Ag LLC | Bluffton, IN 46714 | $86,351 |
10 | Chad Roush | Marion, IN 46952 | $78,483 |
11 | Baker Farms Gp | Ossian, IN 46777 | $77,017 |
12 | S & S Family Farms LLC | Montpelier, IN 47359 | $68,399 |
13 | David Barcus Farms LLC | Poneto, IN 46781 | $67,411 |
14 | Avey Farms Inc | Ossian, IN 46777 | $63,643 |
15 | Terry Fausz | Huntington, IN 46750 | $63,494 |
16 | Richard L Roush | Hartford City, IN 47348 | $63,126 |
17 | K A M Farms Inc | Poneto, IN 46781 | $61,264 |
18 | Brian D Fausz | Markle, IN 46770 | $58,893 |
19 | Mark Binegar | Montpelier, IN 47359 | $58,174 |
20 | Byerly Farms Inc | Decatur, IN 46733 | $57,966 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>