Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Whitley County, Indiana, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 26
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $78,987 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Edwin H Clifford | Mountain Grove, MO 65711 | $16,600 |
2 | Myers Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $12,501 |
3 | Donald Sheiss | Larwill, IN 46764 | $6,222 |
4 | Steven R Western | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $6,016 |
5 | Harold O Fairchild Jr | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $5,028 |
6 | Zachary Zumbrun | Tennessee Rdg, TN 37178 | $3,756 |
7 | Ronald E Smithson Jr | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $3,480 |
8 | Joe L Lopez | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $3,152 |
9 | Robert G Schuman | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $2,952 |
10 | Hoffman Land & Cattle LLC | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $2,644 |
11 | Robert J Hiss Jr | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,943 |
12 | Jonathan Pettigrew | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,872 |
13 | Nancy L Waugh | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,843 |
14 | Michael R Long | Larwill, IN 46764 | $1,639 |
15 | Wait Farms | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,436 |
16 | James A Hartley | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $1,216 |
17 | Mark A Wagoner | North Manchester, IN 46962 | $1,148 |
18 | Chad A Hockemeyer | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $1,052 |
19 | Justin L Nicodemus | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $1,012 |
20 | Brent Kyle Emerick | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $808 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>