Farm Subsidy information
Whitley County, Indiana
Total Subsidies in Whitley County, Indiana, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 569
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $8,061,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Shady Grove Farms Inc | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $490,139 |
2 | Cory Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $269,812 |
3 | Chris Long | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $203,133 |
4 | Molly Long | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $202,120 |
5 | South View Farms Inc | Claypool, IN 46510 | $195,482 |
6 | Michael W Mccoy | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $136,170 |
7 | Hinen Family Farms LLC | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $77,598 |
8 | Cormany Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $77,263 |
9 | Woll Family Farms | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $65,720 |
10 | Hoffman Land & Cattle LLC | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $54,068 |
11 | Steven L Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $51,372 |
12 | Kevin E Bollinger | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $48,160 |
13 | D & R Farms And Sons, LLC | Larwill, IN 46764 | $47,028 |
14 | Beacon Credit Union ** | Wabash, IN 46992 | $45,095 |
15 | Stetzel Farms Inc | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $42,704 |
16 | Dairy Enterprise LLC | Kimmell, IN 46760 | $41,183 |
17 | Brent Kyle Emerick | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $41,013 |
18 | Ryan W Geiger | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $38,010 |
19 | Walter Trabert Jr | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $37,109 |
20 | Dan Michel | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $36,887 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>