Loan Deficiency in Whitley County, Indiana, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 818
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Whitley County, Indiana totaled $18,089,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cormany Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $483,131 |
| 2 | Stanley Sickafoose | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $432,050 |
| 3 | Shady Grove Farms Inc | Churubusco, IN 46723 | $384,430 |
| 4 | Steven L Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $329,904 |
| 5 | Thomas E Western | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $270,635 |
| 6 | Hoffmans Hillcrest Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $264,745 |
| 7 | Leroy Waugh | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $257,387 |
| 8 | P Dennis Wolfe | Larwill, IN 46764 | $257,256 |
| 9 | Barbara Sickafoose | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $242,933 |
| 10 | South View Farms Inc | Claypool, IN 46510 | $242,222 |
| 11 | Hoffman Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $240,764 |
| 12 | Stetzel Farms Inc | Roanoke, IN 46783 | $212,304 |
| 13 | Jeffery L Sickafoose | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $210,398 |
| 14 | Johnson Riverbend Farms Inc | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $197,846 |
| 15 | Longville Farms Inc | Kimmell, IN 46760 | $188,137 |
| 16 | Long Farms Partnership | Pierceton, IN 46562 | $187,371 |
| 17 | Max E Michel | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $186,513 |
| 18 | Dan Michel | South Whitley, IN 46787 | $183,144 |
| 19 | Walter Trabert Sr | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $181,293 |
| 20 | James T Cormany | Columbia City, IN 46725 | $176,154 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf