Emergency Conservation Program in Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 9,380
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Iowa totaled $45,723,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Beverly Bailey Family Trust | Hollywood, MD 20636 | $500,000 |
2 | H & H Farms | Crescent, IA 51526 | $400,000 |
3 | Nancy Newlon-nancy Newlon Revocable Trust | Nebraska City, NE 68410 | $383,786 |
4 | Patrick Newlon | Glenwood, IA 51534 | $343,425 |
5 | Riverside Farms Ltd | Missouri Valley, IA 51555 | $287,565 |
6 | Daniel K Hoffman | Marion, IA 52302 | $214,678 |
7 | Roger E Rand Estate | Sioux City, IA 51102 | $200,000 |
8 | Sabel Farms Inc | Missouri Valley, IA 51555 | $200,000 |
9 | Dilts Brothers LLC | Underwood, IA 51576 | $197,396 |
10 | Chris Sim Dewey | Nebraska City, NE 68410 | $194,970 |
11 | Sandra-sandra S. Kli Klinesteker | Grand Rapids, MI 49546 | $193,262 |
12 | Sheldon Frederick LLC | Percival, IA 51648 | $185,026 |
13 | Blencoe Farm Prtsp | Omaha, NE 68114 | $175,720 |
14 | Peterson Farms Partnership | Homestead, FL 33034 | $169,560 |
15 | D & J P Farms LLC | Crescent, IA 51526 | $163,336 |
16 | Charles Bentley Farms Inc | Onawa, IA 51040 | $151,631 |
17 | Douglas Michael Lyons | Nebraska City, NE 68410 | $151,055 |
18 | D Joe Frost | Crescent, IA 51526 | $149,781 |
19 | Richard Tichy | Ely, IA 52227 | $140,011 |
20 | Payne Valley Farms LLC | Hamburg, IA 51640 | $138,276 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>