Total Disaster Programs in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,068
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $15,416,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Duane Francis Lynch | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $94,204 |
22 | Kevin Virgil Warnke | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $92,699 |
23 | , | $92,112 | |
24 | Alan John Bohr | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $91,884 |
25 | James Donald Eckenrod | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $91,517 |
26 | Leon Andrew Zeien | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $90,335 |
27 | Joseph Charles Meirick | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $89,762 |
28 | Donald Patrick Blazek Jr | Lawler, IA 52154 | $86,296 |
29 | David Ray Leichtman | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $85,612 |
30 | Dennis Lee Chambers | Charles City, IA 50616 | $84,926 |
31 | Kimberly Jo Blazek | Lawler, IA 52154 | $84,142 |
32 | Leonard Charles Dunn | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $78,459 |
33 | William Francis Palmersheim | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $77,465 |
34 | Ricky Joseph Throndson | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $77,435 |
35 | Erion Farm Management Inc | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $74,276 |
36 | M & D Farms | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $74,208 |
37 | James Eugene Shatek | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $73,634 |
38 | Harvey Bernard Drewelow | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $72,588 |
39 | Michael Francis Reicks | Lawler, IA 52154 | $69,124 |
40 | Rex Allen Nolte | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $68,820 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”