Total Disaster Programs in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 168
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $417,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jeff William Eichenberger | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $50,073 |
| 2 | Thomas J Dunn | Elma, IA 50628 | $18,798 |
| 3 | Joseph F Dunn | Elma, IA 50628 | $18,795 |
| 4 | Brian R Kellogg | Ionia, IA 50645 | $17,540 |
| 5 | Michael G Heit | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $12,306 |
| 6 | Russell D Busta | Lawler, IA 52154 | $11,341 |
| 7 | Adam Christopher Drewelow | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $10,867 |
| 8 | Jerry Allen Ptacek | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $9,538 |
| 9 | Kirk Thomas Lynch | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $7,781 |
| 10 | Richard E Speicher | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $7,742 |
| 11 | Harvey Bernard Drewelow | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $7,499 |
| 12 | Grober Dairy LLC | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $7,407 |
| 13 | John Lee Kobliska | Elma, IA 50628 | $6,233 |
| 14 | Gary Allen Swestka | Cresco, IA 52136 | $6,043 |
| 15 | Shanon George Maloy | Ionia, IA 50645 | $5,904 |
| 16 | Aaron Thomas Johnson | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $5,379 |
| 17 | Faythe Elizabeth Drewelow | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $5,000 |
| 18 | Leon Charles Sheets | Ionia, IA 50645 | $4,975 |
| 19 | Kenneth Raphael Heying | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $4,946 |
| 20 | Joseph Charles Meirick | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $4,928 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf