Total Disaster Programs in Chickasaw County, Iowa, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 81 to 100 of 1,068
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Chickasaw County, Iowa totaled $15,416,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
81 | Adam Christopher Drewelow | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $48,260 |
82 | Matthew Lynn Wurzer | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $48,183 |
83 | Michael Henry Tilkes | Alta Vista, IA 50603 | $47,645 |
84 | James George Ashley | Ionia, IA 50645 | $46,937 |
85 | Theodore Steege III | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $46,892 |
86 | Dale Roger Glaser | Ionia, IA 50645 | $46,830 |
87 | Michael J Kurtenbach | Lawler, IA 52154 | $46,721 |
88 | Donald Joseph Busta | Lawler, IA 52154 | $46,540 |
89 | Larry Eugene Steege | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $46,445 |
90 | Roger Francis Tiemessen | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $45,828 |
91 | Norman Edwin Wurzer | Fredericksburg, IA 50630 | $45,596 |
92 | Breitbach Farms Inc | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $45,463 |
93 | Steven James Grove | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $44,476 |
94 | Dan Lester Dietz | Nashua, IA 50658 | $44,300 |
95 | Patrick Henry Rosonke | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $44,181 |
96 | Bryce Rickey Elliott | Sumner, IA 50674 | $43,794 |
97 | Michael G Heit | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $43,172 |
98 | Travis J Jones | Ionia, IA 50645 | $43,109 |
99 | Judy Janice Maloy | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $42,643 |
100 | Rocky Layne Burgart | New Hampton, IA 50659 | $42,620 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”